BOLD STATEMENT THAT ONE WILL NEVER SO WE THE
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
What Is The Best Brand Of Remote Car Starters
MovimientoTierra and Freedom
Indigenous, peasants, small producers, exporting agricultural Consumers, environmentalists and United Chefs Defense of Our Biodiversity
Income No to GMO in Peru
President Alan Garcia and some of its senior officials in the sectoragrario are making a last faenón before leaving the funciónpública to make way for the new authorities elected by the people. Setrata the recently approved Regulation National Institute deInnovación Sector (INIA) on Biosafety, which allows the import transgenic seeding in order to further the interests of companies importing seed unacuantas and quequieren poultry farmers to increase their profits without caring about the negative impact that transgenic seeds can USOD for our biodiversity, which is elcapital larger than our country.
This has led to the rejection of a wide range of social sectoreseconómicos and are aware of the importance of nuestrabiodiversidad. Are rejecting the indigenous organizations, peasant smallholders Yde living of our rich biodiversity. The agro-export sectors estánrechazando who know the value of nuestrabiodiversidad in international markets. The are rejecting expertosambientalistas ranging from ecological to the Society Forum Peruvian Environmental photos.
are rejecting And also the chefs and consumers. As hanseñalado Mariano Valderrama, President of the Peruvian Association Acurio Gastronomíay the same, our most decorated chef internationally elingreso of GM seeds in Peru even jeopardizes the country's culinary crecienteindustria, whose success is certainly in their buenoscocineros but especially in the biodiversity of our country, we permiteque huge variety of food products that are unique to elmundo.
Politically, this nonsense is supported altosdirigentes of Fujimori, as the agro-industrial businessman and former minister José Chlimper deAgricultura, which has declared itself in favor of the measure, confirming that the private sector a good deal worth more than all cnn, whether human rights or ecologíla and biodiversity.
Fortunately, the representatives of Ghana have ruled Peru firmementecontra this measure and announced that a future Nationalist government regulation and review derogaráeste fully the national policy.
Movement for Land and Freedom, as in the case of conflictosentre extractive companies and local people, this is an issue can not elque have half measures. Thus, clearly and firmly opposed to this measure exponemosnuestra with the following arguments:
§ lospaíses We are one of most mega-diverse in the world, much of our agriculture is free yproducción GM and organic agriculture has unsignificativo our growth and economic potential in the market both nacionalcomo in international markets.
§ Much ofthis biodiversity is used, maintained and reproduced by our people indígenasy peasant ymedianos for our small farmers. They can and should be the main competitive advantages beneficiariosde that biodiversity generates a mundoglobalizado, compared to markets that increasingly demand this type of production.
§ Lalas The opinion of indigenous peoples and farmers and producers and work with our biodiversity agroindustrialesque is no need for atransgénicos to be more productive and efficient. Surely , some small sectors of trade and agroindustriaavícola importer may benefit from the GM but you can not destroy natural elcapital Peru's most important for the benefit of those sectoresminoritarios the country.
§ GMOs (and fully confirmed) are associated with many business interests Deunan transnational corporations (Monsanto, Bayer and Syngenta, among others) also have rights that produce transgenic seeds yterminan do farmers dependent tecnológicosde these corporate packages. This is the interest today is intended to be imposed on the unamayoría.
§ yprofundamente is absurd contradictory, just as at home and enextranjero are beginning to recognize AOur biodiversity and our food and the brand is positioned Perúasociada our natural and cultural heritage, the Government of favors PresidenteGarcía commercial interests of specific sectors paraarriesgar all the progress and the enormous potential that our biodiversidadtiene for the majority.
§ The principioprecautorio, contained in the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety laBiotecnología force in Peru since July 2004 cualquiertipo perfectly legitimate position that questions the use of GMOs, and in that sense, dadala controversy exists about its "pros and cons" can limitarindefinidamente proposed use, or at least until there pruebasirrefutables on its advantages .
Porestas considerations, we propose that:
§ The actualCongreso of the Republic must reject the recently approved Regulation Porel INIA and instead adopt the Draft Law No. 3599-2009 declaring the moratorium on the entry of transgenic the national territory. This is immediate and urgent unamedida not tolerate any delay.
§ The nuevoCongreso should discuss and approve the entry of GM BAN alPerú.
§ The MINAM nuevoGobierno be financed by a thorough and independientesobre the presence and origin of GM products in Peru, with lafinalidad removal from the production and the market proceeded to punish civily criminally on those who entered in violation of existing rules alrespecto.
§ The nuevoCongreso and the new Government, in coordination with the Governments Regional and Local and indigenous organizations, farmers, producers, agribusiness, consumers and chefs, should discuss and approve a policy and aprovechamientosostenible strategy of our biodiversity.
Different Peru's agriculture can be enhanced in many ways (including biotech applications) that do not necessarily pass through lageneración of GMOs and their introduction or marketing. Instead, we assume elriesgo to allow entry transgenic seeds at high esmuy country, especially as the country of origin of many varieties vegetalesque have greater strategic value and real compared to the eventual aportede living modified organisms (LMOs).
need a radically different policy. And it can and should serelaborada and implemented with the participation of all stakeholders sectoreshonestamente in the sustainable, equitable einclusivo of our biodiversity.
Lima, May 1, 2011.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment